Dragasits v. Rucker et al

Plaintiff: Stephen Dragasits
Defendant: T. Rucker, Figueros, L. Marshall and K. Mitchell
Case Number: 3:2018cv00512
Filed: March 8, 2018
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Referring Judge: Andrew G. Schopler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 6, 2018 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b) and for Failing to Comply With FRCP 8. The Court Grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days leave from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 09/05/2018. (Plaintiff served copy of this Order and blank civil rights complaint form via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
May 10, 2018 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: 1) Granting 2 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; 2) Dismissing Claims for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust a ccount the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Court Dismisses Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Paramo, Stratton, Rojas, Stout, Frost, Aguirre, Sosa, Voong and Liu. The Court Grants Plainti ff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to either: (1) Notify the Court of the intention to proceed with the claims against Rucker, Figueroa, Marshal, and Mitchell only; or (2) File an Amended Complaint (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 05/10/2018. (Plaintiff served copy of this Order and blank civil rights complaint form via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dragasits v. Rucker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Dragasits
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Figueros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?