Stroud v. Gore et al
Willard Richard Stroud, Jr. |
Sheriff William D. Gore, San Diego, County of, Detective Lizarraga, Sergeant Michalke, Detective Oshea, Unknown Sheriff's Deputies and Others and City of San Diego Paramedic Services |
3:2018cv00515 |
March 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Janis L. Sammartino |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 ORDER Approving Application 139 for Reimbursement of Expenses Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.8(a)(2). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/10/23. (aas)(jms). |
Filing 127 ORDER Sua Sponte Resetting Final Pretrial Conference. To accommodate its own schedule, the Court sua sponte RESETS the Final Pretrial Conference for 1/12/2023 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 4D before Judge Janis L. Sammartino. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/1/2022. (tcf) |
Filing 118 ORDER Granting 109 Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/22/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 116 ORDER Denying 108 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. The Court will issue separate rulings on the Deputy Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 109 ) and Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time and Request Court Appointed Attorney (ECF No. 110 ) in due course. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/16/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 114 ORDER Vacating Hearing and Taking Matter Under Submission without Oral Argument (ECF No. 108 ). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and accordingly VACATES the hearing scheduled for 1:30 PM on 5/26/2022, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/20/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 107 ORDER Granting 106 Ex Parte Motion to Continue Deadline for Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. The County Defendants SHALL FILE their Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 4/21/2022. Plaintiff Willard Richard Stroud, Jr., SHALL FILE his opposition on or before 5/5/2022. The County Defendants MAY FILE their reply, if any, on or before 5/12/2022. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/1/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf) |
Filing 105 ORDER (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 86 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; and (2) Overruling as Moot Defendants' Evidentiary Objections. The Court therefore GRANTS the Dep uty Defendants leave to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment, not to exceed ten (10) pages, addressing only Plaintiff's claim for unreasonable seizure of his person. Should the Deputy Defendants elect to do so, they SHALL FILE their s upplemental motion on or before 4/7/2022. Plaintiff SHALL FILE his opposition, not to exceed ten (10) pages, on or before 4/21/2022. The Deputy Defendants SHALL FILE their reply, if any, not to exceed five (5) pages, on or before 4/28/2022. Upon comp letion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and issue a ruling in due course. On the other hand, should the Deputy Defendants elect not to file a s upplemental motion for summary judgment, the Parties SHALL CONFER and SHALL FILE a proposed schedule of pretrial dates and deadlines within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Finally, in light of the Court 039;s partial denial of the Deputy Defendants' Motion and given that Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, see ECF No. 4 , the Court will entertain a motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Should Plai ntiff wish to file a motion for appointment of counsel, Plaintiff SHALL FILE his motion within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/21/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 98 ORDER Granting 95 Motion to Vacate Pretrial Deadlines. The parties are ORDERED to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin within three days of a ruling on the pending motion for summary judgment to reset pretrial dates if appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/8/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 84 ORDER Conditionally Granting 81 Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Electronically. Plaintiff SHALL REGISTER as a user with the Clerk's Office and as a subscriber per section 2(b) of the ECF Manual and SHALL FILE, within fourteen (14) da ys of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed, confirmation of his access to equipment meeting the technical specifications required for CM/ECF access and his agreement to abide by the ECF Manual. Should Plaintiff fail to confirm his access to the necessary equipment in accordance with this Order, the Court may revoke Plaintiff's electronic filing privileges. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/7/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 71 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. The Court dismisses without prejudice all causes of action against the County of San Diego and dismisses with prejudice Plain tiffs third cause of action and all causes of action against Defendants Snelling and Racine; Defendants Motion is otherwise denied. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the electronic docketing of this Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/05/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 and 46 Defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/16/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Sheriff William D. Gore and Sergeant Paul Michalke are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days of the electronic docketing of this Order. (Summons and IFP package prepared as to the First Amended Complaint). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/27/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 14 ORDER Granting 13 Motion to File Amended Complaint. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 6/22/2018. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/24/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl) |
Filing 4 ORDER (1) Granting 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service; and (3) Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/26/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(IFP PACKET MAILED/COPY TO USMO)(mpl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.