Andrews v. Hodges et al
Plaintiff: Eric Andrews
Defendant: J. Hodges, M. Garcia and Department of Corrections
Case Number: 3:2018cv00530
Filed: March 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Del Norte
Presiding Judge: Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge: Karen S. Crawford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court grants Defendants' motions and dismisses this action in its entirety without prejudice and without leave to amend in this action based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit and Plaintiff's failure to state a plausible Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Cross.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (1) Denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and (2) Granting 7 Extension of Time to File Civil Filing Fee and First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is given an additional 30 days leave from the date this Order is signed in which to pay the initi al civil filing fee and file a First Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted in the Court's 3/16/2018 Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended pleading within this time frame, the Court will dismiss this entire action for the reasons set forth in the 3/16/2018 Order and for failing to comply with a Court Order. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/25/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (1) Denying 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and (2) Dismissing Civil Action for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted 45 days leave from the date this Order is"Filed" in wh ich to pay the $400 initial civil filing fee and file a First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a court approved civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/16/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Prisoner 1983 packet mailed)(rmc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Hodges et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Hodges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?