William Bradley v. Katchka et al
Plaintiff: William Bradley
Defendant: Katchka, M. Castillo, Alvarez, . and D Paramo
Case Number: 3:2018cv00605
Filed: March 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jill L. Burkhardt
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER (1) Overruling Plaintiff's objections, (2) Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation, and (3) Granting 16 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to cure the specific deficiencies enumerated above within forty-five (45) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/01/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jpp).
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 16 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by M. Castillo, Alvarez. Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2018. Replies due by 1/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 11/9/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
May 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: (1) Sua Sponte Dismissing Defendants Katchka and Paramo Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service Upon Defendants Castillo and Alvarez Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. & #167; 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Katchka (individual) and D Paramo (individual) terminated. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/25/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (IFP PACKET MAILED)(mpl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William Bradley v. Katchka et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katchka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alvarez, .
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?