Thomas v. State Farm General Insurance Company
| Sarah Aislinn Flynn Thomas |
| State Farm General Insurance Company and State Farm Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2018cv00728 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER: (1) Overruling Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 39 ); (2) Denying Defendant's Ex Parte Motion as Moot (ECF No. 40 ); and (3) Directing the Clerk to Enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/3/20. (jmo)
|
|
Filing
38
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER Re: Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to the good faith and fair dealing claim. Plaintiff may submit a brief exceeding no more than five pages by 1/15/2020. If the Court does not receive a timely objection from Plaintiff, the Court will instruct the clerk to enter judgment in this case. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/7/2020.(jmo)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying Defendant's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties shall file Joint Status Report by 12/24/2019, indicating the status of all claims in this action in light of this Order and whether entry of judgment is appropriate. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 12/10/2019. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
