Arcturus Therapeutics LTD. v. Payne et al
| Arcturus Therapeutics LTD. |
| Joseph E. Payne, Peter Farrell, Andrew Sassine, Bradley Sorenson, James Barlow and Does 1 through 100 |
| 3:2018cv00766 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Expedited Discovery. The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion. Specifically, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintif f's motion for expedited discovery and grants as modified Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. Accordingly, the Court orders Defendant Joseph E. Payne to amend his Schedule 13D by attaching a copy of the complaint in this action and file it with the SEC on or before 6/1/2018. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/22/2018. (rmc)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Denying 20 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration of 19 Order on Motion for Expedited Discovery and Preliminary Injunction Briefing Schedule. The Court denies Plaintiff's ex parte motion. Accordingly, all other dates, guidelines, and requirements remain as previously set. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/10/2018. (rmc)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; Vacating and Resetting Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Expedited Discovery; Setting Briefing Schedule; and Denying as Moot 17 Defendant Payne's Motio n for an Extension of Time. While the Court finds no exigency requiring the issuance of a TRO, the Court acknowledges Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction and request for expedited discovery. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff&# 039;s motion for a TRO, vacates the hearing currently set for 5/1/2018, and resets the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery for 5/21/2018 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3D. As such, Defendants must file a n opposition, if any, on or before 5/7/2018 and Plaintiff must file its reply, if any, on or before 5/14/2018. As Defendants have not yet appeared in this action, the Court orders Plaintiff to provide a copy of this Order to Defendants no later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Thursday, 4/26/2018. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/26/2018. (rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
