Polymer Technology Systems, Inc. v. ACON Laboratories, Inc. et al
| Polymer Technology Systems, Inc. |
| ACON Laboratories, Inc. and ACON Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., LTD. |
| 3:2018cv00805 |
| April 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER granting Defendant ACON Lab's 17 Motion to Stay Action Pending ITC Investigation; denying without prejudice Defendant ACON Biotech's 18 Motion to Quash and Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. Case stayed until pending final decision in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1116. Court orders the parties to file a joint status report within six (6) months from the date this Order is filed, and to file a joint status report every six months thereafter until the ITC I nvestigation No. 337-TA-1116 has concluded. Court orders the parties to file a joint status report within seven (7) days after the ITC issues its final decision in Investigation No. 337-TA-1116. Defendant ACON Biotech's motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to ACON Biotech refiling the motion, if necessary, once the stay is lifted. Court vacates the 7/30/2018 hearing date on ACON Biotech's motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 7/11/2018. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
