United States of America et al v. S.M.R.T., LLC et al
| 3:2018cv00822 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney's Fees [ECF No. 82 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/29/2022. (ddf)
|
|
Filing
65
SCHEDULING ORDER regulating discovery and other pre-trial proceedings. Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 11/14/2022 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law due by 11/21/2022. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/12/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/19/2022 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5A before Judge Roger T. Benitez.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 11/02/2021.(jpp)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 41 , 45 Government Parties' motions to intervene. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/28/2021. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Denying 34 (1) Request for Judicial Notice and (2) Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/2/2021. (mme)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America et al v. S.M.R.T., LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
