Esparza v. Mazda Motor America, Inc. et al
| Carlos D. Esparza |
| Does 1 through 10 and Mazda Motor America, Inc. |
| Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. and Roes 1-20 |
| Mazda Motor America, Inc. doing business as Mazda North American Operations |
| 3:2018cv00853 |
| May 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M Anello |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 bc |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Potential Tag-Along Actions by Mazda Motor America, Inc. (Hugret, Spencer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Mazda Motor America, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Mazda Motor Corporation for Mazda Motor America, Inc. (tcf) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Mazda Motor America, Inc. (tcf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2017-00019469-CU-BC-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11177140.), filed by Mazda Motor America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration ISO Removal, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C-1, #6 Exhibit C-2, #7 Exhibit C-3, #8 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:18-cv-853-MMA-RBB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(tcf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
