White v. Montgomery

White v. Montgomery

Plaintiff:	Larry White
Defendant:	W.L. Montgomery
Case Number:	3:2018cv00877
Filed:	May 3, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Imperial
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Lewis
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 15, 2018	Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Denies Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Dismisses thiscivil action without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to pay the full statutory and ad ministrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). See Coppedge v. Uni ted States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); Gardner v. Pogue, 558 F.2d 548, 550 (9th Cir. 1977) (indigent appellant is permitted to proceed IFP on appeal only if appeal would not be frivolous); and Directs the Clerk of Court to close the file. It Is So Ordered.Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/15/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 15, 2018

Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Denies Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Dismisses thiscivil action without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to pay the full statutory and ad ministrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). See Coppedge v. Uni ted States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); Gardner v. Pogue, 558 F.2d 548, 550 (9th Cir. 1977) (indigent appellant is permitted to proceed IFP on appeal only if appeal would not be frivolous); and Directs the Clerk of Court to close the file. It Is So Ordered.Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/15/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: W.L. Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?