Odish v. Figueroa et al
Dawood Odish |
E. Duke, Jeff Sessions, J. Greene, Fred Figueroa and Gregory Archambeault |
3:2018cv00887 |
May 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Karen S Crawford |
William Q Hayes |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: Odish has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor filed any documents attempting to provide proof of his inability to pay that fee. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 08/21/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jcj) |
Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. To have this case reopened, Odish must submit a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee on or before 7/30/2018. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/31/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mxn) (jao). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Gregory Archambeault, E. Duke, Fred Figueroa, J. Greene, Jeff Sessions, filed by Dawood Odish. (Filing fee $ 5; fee not paid; IFP not filed.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-887-WQH-KSC. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.