McKean v. ABC Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Jacob McKean |
| ABC Financial Services, Inc. and The Arena Martial Arts |
| 3:2018cv00923 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will dismiss the action against Defendant The Arena without prejudice unless Plaintiff files a declaration within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order showing cause as to why the case against Defendant The Arena should not be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/27/2020.(mme)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: ABC Financial's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 43 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may request leave to amend pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7.1 and 15.1(c). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/31/2019. (ag)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiff Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 39 -1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file the proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 39 -4) within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/3/2019. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Granting Plaintiff Leave to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 27 ) is Granted. Plaintiff may file the proposed First Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No.27-3) on or before 01/02/2019. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/18/2018. (ajs)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing the Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion for An Order Granting Leave to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 29 ) is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Plaintiff's reda cted/redlined Proposed FAC attached to the Declaration of Sheldon A. Ostroff (Ex. 2, ECF No. 29-1) shall be considered filed nunc pro tunc as of 11/13/2018. Plaintiff's request for a continuance of the 12/17/2018 hearing date on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 27 ) is Denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/06/2018. (ajs)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's first, second, and third claims are dismissed without prejudice. No later than twenty (20) days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may request leave to amend pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7.1 and 15.1(c). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/24/2018. (acc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
