Caccamise v. Credit One Bank, N.A. et al
Jordan Caccamise |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC., Monetary Management of California, Inc., Credit One Bank, N.A., WebBank. Inc., Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Bluestem Brands, Inc., LVNV Funding, LLC., Trans Union, LLC., First Premier Bank, TD Bank USA, N.A., Bluestem Brands, Inc. doing business as Fingerhut and Monetary Management of California, Inc. doing business as Money Mart |
3:2018cv00971 |
May 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Janis L Sammartino |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bluestem Brands, Inc., Credit One Bank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., First Premier Bank, Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., LVNV Funding, LLC., Monetary Management of California, Inc., TD Bank USA, N.A., Trans Union, LLC., WebBank. Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11225568.), filed by Jordan Caccamise. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)The new case number is 3:18-cv-971-JLS-BLM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Sinnett, Wayne)(tcf) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.