Mackenson v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
| Jean-Baptiste Robens Mackenson |
| Government Employees Insurance Company, Does 1 to 20 and Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO |
| 3:2018cv01026 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Government Employees Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, Identifying Corporate Parent Geico Corporation and Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for Government Employees Insurance Company. (sjm) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Government Employees Insurance Company. (sjm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2018-00018824-CU-BC-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11249982), filed by Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1026-W-AGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(sjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
