Ludlow v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
| Daniel Ludlow |
| Flowers Foods, Inc. and Flowers Bakeries, LLC |
| 3:2018cv01190 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 015 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
455
ORDER Granting 451 Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action, FLSA, and PAGA Settlement. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 3/18/24. (exs)
|
|
Filing
435
ORDER Granting 434 Motion for Substitution of Party. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 12/11/2023. (exs)
|
|
Filing
428
ORDER Granting 427 Joint Motion for Continuance of October 9, 2023 Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 10/6/2023. (exs)
|
|
Filing
410
ORDER Denying Plaintiff Ludlow's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 07/19/2023. (cxl1)
|
|
Filing
365
ORDER Denying 297 Motion for Decertification; Denying 303 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 3/15/2023. (smy1)
|
|
Filing
351
ORDER Granting in Part the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order: Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/13/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Jinsook Ohta. Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 8/22/2023 01:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law due by 11/15/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/6/2023.Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 1/9/2023. (exs)
|
|
Filing
312
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 213 . Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 7/5/2022. (axc)
|
|
Filing
307
ORDER Denying 225 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Eighteen Opt-In Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 6/1/2022. (axc)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER Granting 200 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 9/29/21. (sxa)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant's 123 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 10/30/20. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER denying 175 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/03/2020. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER granting in part 169 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 7/06/2020. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER: (1) Granting Defendants' motion to stay; (2) Denying without prejudice Plaintiffs' motion for class certification; (3) Deferring ruling on Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF Nos. 90 , 91 , 116 , 123 , 135 , 140 ). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/18/2020. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER denying 74 Plaintiffs' Motion to compel; and (2) Denying 75 as moot Defendants' Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 11/22/2019. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: (1) Granting in Part 15 Ex Parte Motion to Continue; (2) Continuing Hearing; and (3) Setting Briefing Schedule. The Motion Hearing is continued to 9/27/2018 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Janis L. Sammartino. Additionally, the Court sets the foll owing briefing schedule. Defendants shall file an Opposition to the Motion for Conditional Certification on or before 9/13/2018. Plaintiff shall file a Reply in Support of his Motion, if any, on or before 9/20/2018. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/20/2018. (mpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
