Taleff et al v. Taleff
Tony Taleff and Vera Taleff |
Marcia Lynn Sattgast Taleff |
3:2018cv01294 |
June 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Jan M. Adler |
Anthony J. Battaglia |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; Denying as Moot 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. ; Denying as Moot 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/6/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Sua Sponte Dismissing 1 Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; denying as moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court DENIES as moot Taleff's motion to pr oceed IFP, DISMISSES sua sponte the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and DENIES as moot Taleff's motion to appoint counsel. If Taleff elects to continue in federal court rather than re-file in state court, Taleff must file: (1) an amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and (2) an updated IFP motion. Any amended complaint must clearly set forth why this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.