Riley v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al
Dasha Riley |
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Mortgage Investors Group |
3:2018cv01297 |
June 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
William Q. Hayes |
Andrew G. Schopler |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Specialized (ECF No. 19 ) is Granted. Plaintiff's civil conspiracy claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 is dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Pla intiff's remaining state law claims, and dismisses those claims without prejudice. It is further Ordered that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Quality (ECF No. 7 ) is Denied as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 01/10/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is Granted.(ECF No. 2 ). The U.S. Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint and summons upon Defendants as directed by Plaintiff on the U.S. Marshal Form 285. Plaintiff's ex parte a pplication for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction is Denied.(ECF No. 4 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 06/29/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (ajs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.