Buso v. Vigo Importing Co. et al
| Anthony Buso |
| Vigo Importing Co. and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 3:2018cv01328 |
| June 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER: It is hereby Ordered that the Clerk reopen the case. It is further Ordered that the Notice of Lodgement (ECF No. 24 ) be stricken from the record. Any claims for costs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54.1. On November 28, 2018 , the Court issued an Order (ECF No. 22 ) granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12 ). The docket reflects that no motions to file an amended complaint have been filed within the time allowed by Local Rule 7.1. It is further Ordered that the Clerk shall close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 01/10/2019.(ajs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2019: # 1 Stricken Document) (ajs).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12 ) is Granted. Any motions to file an amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this order in accordance with Local Rule 7.1. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/28/2018. (ajs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
