Orozco v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Gloria B Orozco
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2018cv01329
Filed: June 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Presiding Judge: Andrew G. Schopler
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Granting 29 Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b). Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/23/2021. (mme)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER: (1) Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation (2) Granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Denying 21 Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall enter the judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/21/2019.(aef)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (AGS): The Court recommends that plaintiff's summary judgment motion (ECF No. 19 ] be GRANTED, the Commissioner's summary judgment motion (ECF No. 21 ) be DENIED, and the case be remanded. The parties must file any objections by August 20, 2019. A party may respond to any objection within 14 days of receiving it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 08/06/2019.(mxa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?