Langer v. Capricorn Realty Inc. et al
| Chris Langer |
| Capricorn Realty Inc., DOES 1-10 and Noni Salon Boutique Spa LLC |
| 3:2018cv01452 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M Adler |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12188 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. Noni Salon Boutique Spa LLC served. (Carson, Chris) (jao). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas J. Whelan for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18cv1452-W-JMA.(no document attached) (anh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capricorn Realty Inc., Noni Salon Boutique Spa LLC, DOES 1-10, ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11371170.), filed by Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01452-BEN-JMA. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler are assigned to the case. (Carson, Chris)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
