Vargas v. Mid-Coast Transit Constructors et al
| Estela Vargas |
| Skanska USA, Inc., DOES 1 through 50, Herzog Contracting Corp., Mid-Coast Transit Constructors and Stacey and Witbeck, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv01504 |
| June 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| John A Houston |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 lm |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Mid-Coast Transit Constructors, Stacey and Witbeck, Inc. (lrc)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand From Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of San Diego - Central Division, case number 37-2018-00017763-CU-WT-CTL. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11392963.), filed by Mid-Coast Transit Constructors, Stacey and Witbeck, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, NOA, etc., #4 Exhibit C - Request for Dismissal, #5 Exhibit D - Answer to State Court Complaint, #6 Declaration of Kamryn Miller in Support of Defendants' Notice of Removal, #7 Proof of Service Of removal to Federal Court)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1504-JAH-NLS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(lrc)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
