San Diego Unified School District v. Repwest Insurance Company et al
| San Diego Unified School District |
| Repwest Insurance Company and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2018cv01532 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M Anello |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Repwest Insurance Company . Identifying Corporate Parent Amerco for Repwest Insurance Company. (Lapidus, Daniel) (rmc). (jao). |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Repwest Insurance Company. (lrc) (jao). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego - Central Division, case number 37-2018-00028401-CU-BC-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11411185.), filed by Repwest Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Amended State Court Complaint, #5 Exhibit D - Answer to Amended State Court Complaint)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1532-MMA-AGS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(lrc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
