Hinrichsen v. MLD Mortgage, Inc. et al
Rodney L. Hinrichsen |
MLD Mortgage, Inc., DOES 1-10, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and All Persons Unknown |
3:2018cv01533 |
July 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B Brooks |
Mitchell D Dembin |
William Q Hayes |
Dana M Sabraw |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1638 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. of case(s) 3:17-cv-00219-DMS-RBB and 3:18-cv-00526-DMS-RBB. (Campbell, J. Owen) (ajs). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (Campbell, J. Owen) (ajs). (jao). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego - Central Courthouse, case number 37-2018-00027611-CU-OR-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11411801.), filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1533-WQH-MDD. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(lrc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.