Metz et al v. Sharp Healthcare, Inc. et al
| Joseph Charles Metz, Jennifer Rose Perry, Jeffrey Metz and Gianna Marie Metz |
| Sharp Healthcare, Inc., Does 1 through 25, Christopher R. Calvert, M.D., Jason Earl Smith, M.D. and United States of America |
| 3:2018cv01552 |
| July 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M Anello |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 wd |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Christopher R. Calvert, MD. (tcf)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Sharp Healthcare, Inc. (tcf)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL From Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2017-00019283-CU-PO-CTL. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11418467.), filed by Sharp Healthcare, Inc., Jason Earl Smith, M.D. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 State Court Case Management Statement of Sharp, #4 State Court Case Management Statement of Plaintiffs, #5 State Court Notice of Payment of Jury Fee of Sharp)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1552-MMA-MDD. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(tcf)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
