Villaman v. Sessions et al
Jose Alberto Villaman |
David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III and John Kelly |
3:2018cv01592 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Larry Alan Burns is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz for all further proceedings. Pending hearings previously set before the original Judge have been transferred to the newly assigned Judge. The new case number is 18cv1592-BTM.(no document attached) (jrm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Jose Alberto Villaman. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(jrm) (Main Document and Attachment replaced on 7/13/2018) (jrm). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against David Harlow, John Kelly, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Jose Alberto Villaman. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01592-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Tyrell, Jo)(jrm) (Main Document and Attachments replaced on 7/13/2018) (jrm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.