Langer v. CLC Partners, Inc. et al
| Chris Langer |
| CLC Partners, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2018cv01638 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by CLC Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(McMahon, Craig) (anh). |
Filing 4
ORDER Denying Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint [Doc. No. #3 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/11/2018. (anh)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by CLC Partners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(McMahon, Craig)Attorney Craig D McMahon added to party CLC Partners, Inc.(pty:dft) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jao)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against CLC Partners, Inc., Does 1-10 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11462228.), filed by Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1638-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Carson, Chris)(jao)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
