Bozorgi et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Farrah Pirahanachi Nazemi and Monireh Bozorgi |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., World Savings Bank, Does 51-100, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon, Other Wells Does 1 through 50 and Bank of New York |
| 3:2018cv01641 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs must pay the filing fee no later than 8/17/2018, or the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/30/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Farrah Pirahanachi Nazemi. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, IFP Filed, filed by Monireh Bozorgi, Farrah Pirahanachi Nazemi. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1641-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Farrah Nazemi)(jao) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
