Pacheco v. Bushfire Grill, Inc. et al
| Jairo Pacheco |
| Bushfire Beachside, Inc., Bushfire Grill, Inc. and Does 1-100 |
| 3:2018cv01696 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T Benitez |
| William V Gallo |
| John A Houston |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 fl |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Bushfire Beachside, Inc., Bushfire Grill, Inc. No Parties With Financial Interest. (rmc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Bushfire Beachside, Inc., Bushfire Grill, Inc. of Attorney Erik T. Johnson. (rmc) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Bushfire Beachside, Inc., Bushfire Grill, Inc. (rmc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-02018-00026263-CU-OE-NC. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0974-11486708), filed by Bushfire Grill, Inc., Bushfire Beachside, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Decl. of Erik T. Johnson, Esq., #3 Notice of Lodgment, #4 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1696-BEN-WVG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(rmc) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
