Del Villar v. Transdev Services, Inc et al
| Alicia Del Villar |
| Transdev Services, Inc and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2018cv01721 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Transdev Services, Inc. (lrc) (dsn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Transdev Services, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Transdev North America, Inc., Other Affiliate Transdev Services, Inc., Other Affiliate Gleason & Favoarote LLP. (lrc) (dsn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Transdev Services, Inc. (lrc) (dsn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego Central Division, case number 37-2018-0024431-CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11493274.), filed by Transdev Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Jing Tong, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Acknowledgment of Receipt, #5 Exhibit C - Answer, #6 Exhibit D - Declaration of Anna Hernandez)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1721-W-MDD. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(lrc) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
