Haywood v. San Diego CA Public Defender et al
Erica D. Haywood |
San Diego Police Dept., San Diego County, CA District Attorney, McDonald's Corp., Jack In The Box and San Diego CA Public Defender |
3:2018cv01761 |
July 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Michael M Anello |
Bernard G Skomal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court: (1) Dismisses this civil action sua sponte for failure to pay filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1); (2) certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would also be frivolous and therefore, not taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); and (3) Directs the Clerk of Court to close the file (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) (sjt). |
Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action for Failure to Pay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and as Frivolous Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The Court: (1) Dismisses this civil action sua sponte for failure to pay filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1); (2) certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would also be frivolous and therefore, not taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); and (3) Directs the Clerk of Court to close the file. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/30/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jack In The Box, McDonald's Corp., San Diego CA Public Defender, San Diego County, CA District Attorney, San Diego Police Dept., filed by Erica D. Haywood.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1761-MMA-BGS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.