Mahmood v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Entisar Mahmood
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1-50
Case Number: 3:2018cv01763
Filed: July 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Referring Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ed
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 5/16/2019 01:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/17/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/1/2019 10:30 AM before Judge Thomas J. Whelan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 9/4/2018.(jao)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 11/01/2018 01:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 9/4/2018.(jao)
August 30, 2018 Filing 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: A telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation Conference was held on 8/30/2018. The Court set an in-person, parties-required Early Neutral Evaluation Conference for 11/1/2018 at 01:45 PM before and in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. An ENE Order will follow. In addition, a telephonic Case Management Conference was held on 8/30/2018. A scheduling order will follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Matthew March Blum).(Defendant Attorney Paul Berkowitz; Daniel Francisco De La Cruz). (no document attached) (smm)
August 30, 2018 Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(De La Cruz, Daniel) (jao).
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt granting in part and denying in part ECF No. #5 : The parties' Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation (ECF No. #5 ) is granted in part and denied in part to the extent that the Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conferences are hereby RESET and CONVERTED to be TELEPHONIC, counsel-only conferences starting at 04:00 PM on Thursday, 8/30/2018. Plaintiff's principal attorney is responsible for placing one joint call with opposing counsel already on the line into Judge Burkhardt's Chambers at (619) 557-6624. The principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must appear by telephone and be legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the submission of ENE Statements and the Joint Discovery Plan is RESET to 8/30/2018 at 12:00 PM. This order does not otherwise alter the Court's 8/6/2018 Order. (See ECF No. #4 .) (no document attached) (smm)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel F. De La Cruz in Support of Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, #2 Proof of Service)(De La Cruz, Daniel)Attorney Daniel Francisco De La Cruz added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft) (jao).
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 9/10/2018 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE Conference, a Case Management Conference will be held at the conclusion of the ENE Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 8/6/2018.(jao)
July 31, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (tcf) (dsn)
July 31, 2018 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (tcf) (dsn)
July 31, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2018-00029259-CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11507583.), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1763-W-JLB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(tcf) (dsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahmood v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Paul Berkowitz
Represented By: Daniel Francisco De La Cruz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Entisar Mahmood
Represented By: Matthew March Blum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?