Vickrey v. Internal Revenue Service
Donn Vickrey |
Internal Revenue Service |
3:2018cv01792 |
August 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 0982 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Derek W. Kaczmarek, re #10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/21/2018. (mdc) |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11662226 Re: Doc. No. #9 )(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.)(Kaczmarek, Derek)(jrd) |
Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-11662226.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.)(Kaczmarek, Derek)(QC Mailer sent; missing signature.)(jrd) |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #6 Joint Motion to Continue Deadlines And Calendaring Date Responses due by September 7, 2018 is continued to October 19, 2018 and Replies due by October 26, 2018.. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/11/2018. (sjm) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT to Quash Internal Revenue Service Formal Document Request and Complaint for Injunctive Relief against Internal Revenue Service, filed by Donn Vickrey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Cahill, John) (sjm). |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Continue Deadlines and Calendaring Date by Internal Revenue Service. (Senra, Nithya)Attorney Nithya Senra added to party Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft) (sjm). |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Certified Mail by Plaintiff Donn Vickrey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cahill, John) (sjm). |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Certified Mail by Plaintiff Donn Vickrey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cahill, John) (sjm). |
Filing 3 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE: The Court hereby calendars this Petition for September 21, 2018 t 2:00 p.m., Responses due by 9/7/2018, Replies due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/10/2018.(sjm) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ajs) |
Filing 1 MOTION TO QUASH IRS SUMMONS against Internal Revenue Service ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11517052.), filed by Donn Vickrey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1792-BTM. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is assigned to the case.(tcf) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vickrey v. Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
Represented By: | Nithya Senra |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Donn Vickrey | |
Represented By: | John Gregory Cahill |
Represented By: | Derek W. Kaczmarek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.