Dang v Pontier et al
| Joseph Dang and Joseph Dang an individual doing business as Law Office of Joseph Dang |
| Smoke Ranch Surgery Center, LLC, CFA, LLC, UMR Inc., David Pontier, Glenn C. Nusbaum, TEOCO Corporation, Kevin Yoo, Paul E. Kim, MD Inc., EOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, The Phia Group, TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan and CFA, LLC a Maryland limited liability company doing business as Carefirst Administrators |
| 3:2018cv01869 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (lrc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CFA, LLC, EOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, Glenn C. Nusbaum, Paul E. Kim, MD Inc., David Pontier, Smoke Ranch Surgery Center, LLC, TEOCO Corporation, The Phia Group, UMR Inc., Kevin Yoo ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11544035.), filed by Joseph Dang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1869-LAB-BGS. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Dang, Joseph)(lrc) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
