Williams v. Navarro et al
| Lance Williams |
| O. Navarro, E. Ramirez, E. Estrada, RJ Degg and R. Herrera |
| 3:2018cv01964 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of E. Estrada, E. Ramirez, O. Navarro, R. Herrera, RJ Degg against Lance Williams. Court denies Plaintiff's Motion for IFP as barred by 28 USC 1915(g). Court dismisses this action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 USC 1914(a). Court certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3). The case is closed. ( All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as barred by 28 USC 1915(g). Court dismisses this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 USC 1914(a). Court certifies that an IIP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3). Court directs the Clerk to close the file. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/19/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Accepting, from Plaintiff Lance Williams. Non-compliance with local rule(s) General Order 653A: Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, and are not accompanied by a properly supported Motion to Exceed page limitations or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A.;. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/29/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, from Plaintiff Lance Williams. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Duplicate filing accepted previously. See Docket entry #3, Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/29/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/30/2018: #1 Rejected Document) (acc).
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lance Williams. (jms) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lance Williams. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against RJ Degg, E. Estrada, R. Herrera, O. Navarro, E. Ramirez, filed by Lance Williams.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-1964-AJB-BLM. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
