Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pacheco et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Esteban Garcia Pacheco, Alina Santamaria, Esteban Garcia Pacheco Individually doing business as Birrieria El Primo and Alina Santamaria Individually doing business as Birrieria El Primo |
| 3:2018cv01973 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Copyright |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. No Additional Corporate Parents/Interested Parties Identified. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Esteban Garcia Pacheco, Alina Santamaria ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11589151.), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01973-BAS-BGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Bronshteyn, Yasha)(jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2018: #5 Copyright Report) (jrm). Modified to add Copyright Report on 8/24/2018 (jrm). [Copyright Report Mailed](jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
