Rutherford v. Tom's Burgers Family Restaurant et al
| James Rutherford |
| Does 1-10, Nikiforos Valaskantjis, Georgia Valaskantjis and Tom's Burgers Family Restaurant |
| 3:2018cv02022 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| William V Gallo |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Rutherford (Manning, Joseph) (acc). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Rutherford. Nikiforos Valaskantjis, Georgia Valaskantjis served. (Manning, Joseph)(acc). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Rutherford. Tom's Burgers Family Restaurant served. (Manning, Joseph) (acc). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-10, Tom's Burgers Family Restaurant, Nikiforos Valaskantjis, Georgia Valaskantjis ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11617532), filed by James Rutherford. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02022-AJB-WVG. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Manning, Joseph)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
