Brinkerhoff v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kristen Brinkerhoff
Defendant: L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv02034
Filed: August 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: William V Gallo
2 Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Joint Motion To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint And Set Briefing Schedule. Defendant's response To First Amended Complaint due by 11/16/2018; Opposition due by 1/4/2019; Reply due by 1/11/2019. Hearing For Defendant's Anticipated Motion to Dismiss set for 1/18/2019 11:00 AM before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/3/2018. (sjm)
October 2, 2018 Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Joint Motion to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and Set Briefing Schedule by L'Oreal USA, Inc.. (Dorsi, Elizabeth) (sjm).
September 26, 2018 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT [First Amended Class Action Complaint] against L'Oreal USA, Inc., filed by Kristen Brinkerhoff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Syverson, Patricia) (sjm).
September 7, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Anne Dorsi on behalf of L'Oreal USA, Inc. (Dorsi, Elizabeth)Attorney Elizabeth Anne Dorsi added to party L'Oreal USA, Inc.(pty:dft) (sjm).
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting #4 Joint Motion To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint and Set Briefing Schedule. Answer due 10/9/2018. Answer by Respondent due 11/2/2018. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/6/2018. (sjm)
August 31, 2018 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by L'Oreal USA, Inc.. (Mayhew, Thomas) (sjm).
August 31, 2018 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18cv2034-BTM-WVG.(no document attached) (anh)
August 30, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by L'Oreal USA, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent L'Oreal S.A. for L'Oreal USA, Inc. (jdt) (jao).
August 30, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA, County of San Diego, case number 37-2013-00037602-CU-BT-CTL. (Filing fee $400; receipt #0974-11620155), filed by L'Oreal USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Thomas B. Mayhew)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2034-BEN-WVG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(jdt) Modified on 8/30/2018 to enter filing fee (jdt). (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brinkerhoff v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Bradley Mayhew
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Dorsi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Brinkerhoff
Represented By: Patricia N Syverson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?