Sheptin v. San Diego Police Department (911 Services) et al
| Louis Charles Sheptin |
| Path Connections Housing, Allied Universal Security and San Diego Police Department (911 Services) |
| 3:2018cv02083 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jan M Adler |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cvp |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. #2 ); Order Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. His Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff may refile an amended complaint by 10/19/2018. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/17/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt) (sjt).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Louis Charles Sheptin. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against San Diego Police Department (911 Services), Allied Universal Security, Path Connections Housing, IFP Filed, filed by Louis Charles Sheptin. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2083-LAB-JMA. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler are assigned to the case. (Louis Charles Sheptin)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
