Cabral et al v. Denney
Plaintiff: Richard Cabral and Jake Cabral
Defendant: Renee Wills Denney
Case Number: 3:2018cv02104
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: M James Lorenz
Referring Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 au
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2018 Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Renee Wills Denney.(Rucci, Robert)Attorney Robert Samuel Rucci added to party Renee Wills Denney(pty:dft) (sjt).
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting Petition for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem [ECF No. #6 ]; ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as Moot [ECF No. #4 ]. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 10/29/2018. (lrf)
October 25, 2018 Filing 6 Ex Parte MOTION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem by Jake Cabral, Richard Cabral. (McGuire, John) (QC mailer sent re: signature) (sjt).
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Plaintiff's against All Defendants, filed by Richard Cabral, Jake Cabral. (McGuire, John) (sjt).
October 9, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Renee Wills Denney. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proof of Service Proof of Service Re: Motion to Dismiss, #3 Proposed Order)(Parme, Michael)Attorney Michael Cullen Parme added to party Renee Wills Denney(pty:dft) QC Email: Proposed Order(anh).
September 25, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Cabral, Jake Cabral. Renee Wills Denney served. (McGuire, John)(sjt).
September 11, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (tcf) (jao).
September 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Renee Wills Denney ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11656119.), filed by Richard Cabral, Jake Cabral. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2104-L-BGS. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (McGuire, John)(tcf) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cabral et al v. Denney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Renee Wills Denney
Represented By: Robert Samuel Rucci
Represented By: Michael Cullen Parme
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Cabral
Represented By: John F. McGuire, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jake Cabral
Represented By: John F. McGuire, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?