Perez v. Nunez et al
| Jorge Antonio Perez |
| Dominique Vasquez, The California Correctional Parole and Probation Officers Association and Angel Nunez |
| 3:2018cv02174 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Action Without Prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with a Court approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust account statement within 30 days, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/31/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank IFP Motion mailed)(rmc)(sjt).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jorge Antonio Perez. (jms) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Action Without Prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with a Court approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust account statement within 45 days, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/9/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank IFP Motion mailed)(rmc) (dsn)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jorge Antonio Perez. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Angel Nunez, The California Correctional Parole and Probation Officers Association, Dominique Vasquez, filed by Jorge Antonio Perez.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2174-MMA-NLS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
