Lemus v. Sessions et al
Petitioner: Alexis Noel Lemus
Respondent: David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, John Kelly and Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III
Case Number: 3:2018cv02198
Filed: September 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/24/2018. (sjm) (sjt).
September 24, 2018 Filing 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz: Writ Hearing held on 9/24/2018. Order to follow.(Court Reporter/ECR James Pence, Ellen Simone). (Plaintiff Attorney Harini Raghupathi, FD). (Defendant Attorney Michael Lasater, AUSA). (no document attached) (rfm)
September 21, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Hearing: Writ Hearing set for 9/24/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom 15B before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz. (no document attached) (rfm)
September 21, 2018 Filing 2 Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Alexis Noel Lemus. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(sjt)
September 21, 2018 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against David Harlow, John Kelly, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required. Filed by Alexis Noel Lemus. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02198-BTM. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is assigned to the case. (Stitt, Ryan)(sjt) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lemus v. Sessions et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Harlow
Represented By: U S Attorney CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven C. Stafford
Represented By: U S Attorney CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Kelly
Represented By: U S Attorney CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III
Represented By: U S Attorney CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alexis Noel Lemus
Represented By: Ryan W. Stitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?