Petersen v. Neuschmid et al
Hans Antone Petersen |
Xavier Becerra and Robert Neuschmid |
3:2018cv02228 |
September 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Michael S Berg |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay re #2 Order by Hans Antone Petersen. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit)(Balazs, John) (anh). |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg for all further proceedings. The new case number is 18-cv-02228-BEN-MSB. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 11/8/2018.(anh) |
Filing 2 ORDER: Notice Regarding Possible Dismissal of Petition for Failure to Exhaust State Court Remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 10/9/2018.(anh) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Xavier Becerra, Robert Neuschmid, filed by Hans Antone Petersen.(Filing fee $5 - receipt number 0974-11720586) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities, #3 Appendix, #4 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2228-BEN-MDD. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Balazs, John)[Case in Screening] (jms) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.