Langer v. Hanna et al
Chris Langer |
Does 1-10, Razzoki Matti Hanna, Yaldoo Corp. and Nadia R Hanna |
3:2018cv02347 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William V Gallo |
Jeffrey T Miller |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Request for Entry of Clerk Default against Nadia R. Hanna. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(Grace, Phyl) (sjm). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. Yaldoo Corp. served. (Carson, Chris) (dlg). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. Nadia R Hanna served. (Carson, Chris) (sjm). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chris Langer voluntarily dismisses Defendant Razzoki Matti Hanna only, without prejudice (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Carson, Chris) (sjm). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10, Nadia R Hanna, Razzoki Matti Hanna, Yaldoo Corp. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11782471.), filed by Chris Langer.The new case number is 3:18-cv-02347-JM-WVG. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Carson, Chris)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.