Martinez-Sanchez v. Sessions et al
Adan Gilberto Martinez-Sanchez |
David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, John Kelly and Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III |
3:2018cv02395 |
October 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
John A Houston |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Adan Gilberto Martinez-Sanchez (Johnson, James) (jdt). |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge John A. Houston is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Larry Alan Burns for all further proceedings. Pending hearings previously set before the original Judge have been transferred to the newly assigned Judge. The new case number is 18-cv-2395-LAB.(no document attached) (lrc) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Adan Gilberto Martinez-Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus)(lrc) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against David Harlow, John Kelly, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Adan Gilberto Martinez-Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2395-JAH. Judge John A. Houston is assigned to the case. (Johnson, James)(lrc)(jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.