Singh v. Noonan et al
| Sandeep Singh |
| Eric Noonan, Jefferson Sessions and Steve Stafford |
| 3:2018cv02549 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY - Other re #11 Supplemental Briefing filed by Jefferson Sessions. (Weber, Mikaela) (sjm). |
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER re #9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The Motion hearing set for 12/21/18 is vacated. The Motion hearings and briefing schedule set in the order referenced above are controlling. (no document attached) (rfm) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum filed by Jefferson Sessions. (Weber, Mikaela) (jms). (sjm). |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Petitioner Sandeep Singh . (Marks, Michael) (sjm). |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz: Motion Hearing held on 12/7/2018 re #2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum filed by Sandeep Singh, MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. Motion Hearing continued to 12/21/2018 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15B before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz.(Court Reporter/ECR Ellen Simone). (Plaintiff Attorney Roxanna Sandoval, FD). (Defendant Attorney Mikaela Weber, AUSA). (no document attached) (rfm) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Memorandum of Facts and Contentions of Law Responses due by 12/14/2018 Replies due by 12/31/2018. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2019 11:00 AM before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/5/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Memorandum of Facts and Contentions of Law by Jefferson Sessions. (Weber, Mikaela) (jms). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mikaela Lauren Weber on behalf of Jefferson Sessions (Weber, Mikaela)Attorney Mikaela Lauren Weber added to party Jefferson Sessions(pty:res) (jms). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sandeep Singh re #5 Memorandum of Facts and Contentions of Law (Marks, Michael) (jms). |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND CONTENTIONS OF LAW by Sandeep Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Marks, Michael) (jms). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Marks on behalf of Sandeep Singh (Marks, Michael)Attorney Michael A. Marks added to party Sandeep Singh(pty:pet)(jms). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER as to #2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. Plaintiff's Brief due by 11/16/2018, Any Replies due by 11/30/2018. Motion Hearing set for 12/7/2018 03:00 PM in Courtroom 15B before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz.(no document attached) (rfm) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Sandeep Singh. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(mme) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Eric Noonan, Jefferson Sessions, Steve Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Sandeep Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02549-BTM. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is assigned to the case. (Howard, Caitlin)(mme) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
