Langer v. Sedlack Development Co., L.P. et al
| Chris Langer |
| Sedlack Development Co., L.P., Does 1-10, Sedlack Rental Co. and Alexandra J. Waclawski |
| 3:2018cv02649 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Chris Langer, as to Sedlack Development Co., L.P.. (Carson, Chris) (anh). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Chris Langer, as to Sedlack Rental Co.. (Carson, Chris) (anh). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. Alexandra J. Waclawski served. (Carson, Chris) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10, Sedlack Development Co., L.P., Sedlack Rental Co., Alexandra J. Waclawski ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11919891.), filed by Chris Langer.The new case number is 3:18-cv-02649-CAB-BLM. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Carson, Chris)(mme) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
