Brooks v. Freunheim et al
| Richard Scott Brooks |
| Scott Freunheim and Jaxier Beccera |
| 3:2018cv02651 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:18-cv-10506 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 W 1st Street, Suite 4311**Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565*. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs) (jao). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Scott Brooks. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Jaxier Beccera, Scott Freunheim, filed by Richard Scott Brooks.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2651-WQH-BLM. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
