Xifin, Inc. v. Spectracell Laboratories, Inc.
Xifin, Inc. |
Does 1-10 and Spectracell Laboratories, Inc. |
3:2018cv02689 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William V Gallo |
Marilyn L Huff |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Dismissal of the Entire Action with Prejudice by Xifin, Inc. (Cocchia, Robert) (sjm). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xifin, Inc.. Spectracell Laboratories, Inc. served. (Park, Jae) (jdt). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jae K Park on behalf of Xifin, Inc. (Park, Jae)Attorney Jae K Park added to party Xifin, Inc.(pty:pla) (aef). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Xifin, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate XIH, Inc., Other Affiliate XH Holdings, LLC for Xifin, Inc. (jrm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Spectracell Laboratories, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11946679.), filed by Xifin, Inc. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2689-H-WVG. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Cocchia, Robert)(jrm) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.