SASA Investment Holdings, LLC et al v. Chhatrala et al
| SASA Investment Holdings, LLC, Anjli Madan and Sanjay Madan |
| Trav-Cor & Investments, Inc., Chhatrala Investments, LLC, JSAKGP, Inc., Jenish Patel, Bank of America, N.A., Pragati Investments, LLC, SHIVA Management, Inc., Orange Coast Title Company and Hemant Chhatrala |
| 3:2018cv02735 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (lrc) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America, N.A., Hemant Chhatrala, Chhatrala Investments, LLC, JSAKGP, Inc., Orange Coast Title Company, Jenish Patel, Pragati Investments, LLC, SHIVA Management, Inc., Trav-Cor & Investments, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11964969.), filed by Anjli Madan, Sanjay Madan, SASA Investment Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2735-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Berman, Steven)(lrc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
