Rogers v. City of San Diego et al
| Brian F. Rogers |
| San Diego Police Department, David Nisleit, City of San Diego, A to Z Towing Inc. and A to Z Towing Inc. doing business as Road One, Inc. et al. |
| 3:2018cv02746 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| William Q Hayes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is Granted. (ECF No. #2 ). It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) is Dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. If no motion for leave to file a first amended complaint is filed within thirty (30) days of this order, the case will be closed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 01/08/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian F. Rogers. (cdw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against A to Z Towing Inc., City of San Diego, David Nisleit, San Diego Police Department, IFP Filed, filed by Brian F. Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02746-WQH-MDD. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Rogers, Brian F.)(cdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
